Quantcast
Channel: Careers
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 27352

The White House may hand out checks to Americans — or a short-term universal basic income — to soften the blow of coronavirus. Here's how the Silicon Valley dream became a policy plank for Andrew Yang and now Donald Trump.

$
0
0

trump mnuchin coronavirus

  • On Tuesday, the Trump administration said it is "looking at sending checks to Americans immediately" to help offset the financial burden the novel coronavirus.
  • Senator Mitt Romney proposed the idea of giving every US adult $1,000 — or an interim universal basic income — on Monday. 
  • This concept, called universal basic income is a government guarantee that each citizen receives a minimum amount of money.
  • The ideas behind a universal basic income, or UBI, is centuries old, but has been gaining traction in recent years thanks to former 2020 presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who used the idea as a key part of his campaign, as well as billionaire Elon Musk, who's been an outspoken advocate for it. 
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said on Tuesday that the White House is considering giving cash handouts to Americans to help offset the financial hardship the novel coronavirus pandemic has caused. 

"We are looking at sending checks to Americans immediately," he said at the Tuesday news conference. "Americans need cash now and the president wants to get cash now. And I mean now, in the next two weeks."

The Trump administration's announcement comes one day after Senator Mitt Romney publicly called for the government to give US adults each $1,000 during this financially trying time. The idea is an interim, or an emergency, universal basic income (UBI) of sorts. 

The long-simmering, but newly urgent, policy proposal has received high-profile support over the past year. Entrepreneur-turned-presidential candidate Andrew Yang made UBI the cornerstone of his candidacy. His plan was to implement what he called the Freedom Dividend. His plan consisted of guaranteed payments of $1,000 per month, or $12,000 per year, to all U.S. citizens over the age of 18. 

Elon Musk shared his support for Yang and UBI. In a series of brief tweets, Musk said that he supported Yang, who previously founded Venture for America, and that UBI is "obviously needed." 

Andrew Yang

UBI is gaining newfound interest, but the system itself stretches back to the 16th century, when Spanish-born humanist Juan Luis Vives praised a system of unconditional welfare. "Even those who have dissipated their fortunes in dissolute living — through gaming, harlots, excessive luxury, gluttony and gambling — should be given food, for no one should die of hunger," Vives wrote in 1526.

Over the next few centuries, political scientists and sociologists honed the idea of a minimum income even further. In 1797, the American revolutionary Thomas Paine advocated for a "national fund" in the pamphlet "Agrarian Justice,"  for which every American would be awarded fifteen pounds sterling when they turned 21, with another ten pounds per year after age 50. 

Even Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. declared his support for basic income at a Stanford lecture in 1967.

"It seems to me the Civil Rights Movement must now begin to organize for the guaranteed annual income and mobilize forces," King said, "so we can bring to the attention of our nation this need ... which I believe will go a long, long way toward dealing with the Negroes' economic problem and the economic problem many other poor people confront in our nation."

In his final book, Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?, King observed that "no matter how dynamically the economy develops and expands it does not eliminate all poverty." Hence the need for the nation to create full employment — or create incomes. 

martin luther king jr

The decade between 1969 and 1979 marked a crucial turning point in the basic income movement for two reasons.

The first was President Richard Nixon's 1969 proposal of the "Family Assistance Plan." The legislation promised to give an additional $10,400 (in 2016 dollars) each year to families who had kids, depending on income. While the FAP easily made it through the House of Representatives, it ultimately died in the Senate.

The second was the "Mincome Program" that took place in Manitoba, Canada. Between 1974 and 1979, residents in the city of Winnipeg and smaller nearby town of Dauphin received additional monthly income, again based on their income levels.

It wasn't until University of Manitoba economist Evelyn Forget discovered the Mincome files 20 years later that anyone realized what a success the program had been.

Forget's research showed hospitalization rates fell by 8.5%, high school completion rates went up, and new mothers could afford to work less. And in general, few people stopped working — one of the key fears that's often cited about basic income.

By nearly all measures, the conclusion was clear: Basic income held serious potential as a way to lift people out of poverty.

Forget's research was critical because it helped revive the basic income movement after two decades of dormancy. Advocates had been praising the concept all the while, but only within the last decade have mainstream economists considered putting it back into action.

Some of the biggest names in business, particularly the tech world, have endorsed UBI, including Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Richard Branson.

In over a dozen countries and many more cities around the world, academics and policymakers have launched basic income experiments of their own — some completed, some ongoing. Many of the projects have already replicated the effects Forget found in the late 1970s. Much of the contemporary research on UBI and related programs has been carried out in the developing world; the World Bank largely found that the global poor spend the money on household goods, health care, and that various costs that come with schooling. 

As has been observedelsewhere, the biggest issue with basic income is that it still needs more large-scale, years-long empirical study in developed countries to figure out where or not it "works." Given that UBI remains something of a political Rorschach test — the term "government handout" remains a lightning rod in 2020 — it needs more to be more tested than debated. (Though the financial havoc the novel coronavirus is causing Americans may change that). As UBI becomes more mainstream, it stands a stronger chance of being better researched — and ending up as viable policy.

Chris Weller contributed to an earlier version of this post. 

SEE ALSO: The World Economic Forum and the World Health Organization are launching an emergency coronavirus task force of 200 business leaders — including execs from Alphabet and KPMG

Join the conversation about this story »


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 27352

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>